Why the Healthcare Liaison Marketing Model is Broken

After almost ten years as a healthcare and home care community liaison across four organizations and two service verticals, I am ready to say what the entire industry whispers at happy hours but refuses to publish. The liaison field-visit model has broken, the role has degraded beyond recognition, and no one has the data to prove any of it works because the data do not exist.

---

Hi, I’m Ryan.

I’m going to level with you: This is long. It’s going to take you at least 15 to 20 minutes to read it.

You have my word that reading this is worth your time. 

I spent nearly a decade in healthcare and home care marketing.

I started in 2017 with home care agencies, doing private duty marketing across the Metro D.C. area, covering Maryland, Northern Virginia, and the District. I moved into home-based primary care in 2022, covering Washington, Frederick, and Montgomery Counties for a growing organization.

• Four companies. Two service verticals.
• I visited hospitals.
• I visited skilled nursing facilities.
• I visited assisted living communities, independent living communities, and Area Agencies on Aging, and I spoke with every social worker, discharge planner, and case manager who would give me five minutes of their time.
• Across three home care agencies and one home-based primary care company, I watched the same broken marketing model deployed at every single one.

I loved the role because I got to be one of the helpers. And that’s all it has ever been about for me – helping people, like my grandparents, live the best possible life they can, because that generation has earned it. 

And I’d like to share this experience with you.

A Marketing Notebook I’ve Carried for the Last 10 Years

But first, a disclosure, because I want to be clear about something before we go any further: I did not come to these conclusions last Tuesday.

For the better part of a decade, I have been scribbling down my version of a “marketing playbook.” There are a lot of curse words in it, too. This notebook lives in a standard college-ruled notebook that I bought about a decade ago; it travels with me everywhere I go.

And anybody who knows me well knows that I typically carry a notebook with me everywhere I go.

I started carrying a notebook with me when I worked on Capitol Hill. I carry something with me, typically always. It’s part of my Attention Deficit Disorder coping mechanisms – to write things down that frustrate me, to help me find self-awareness, to keep me honest.

I’ve scribbled about bad networking events. A wasted afternoon of drop-in visits here and there. A moment in a parking lot after a particularly hollow interaction, where I sat in my car and wrote three pages about what had just happened and why it felt wrong.

Over nearly a decade and across four organizations, the pages of my records filled. I recorded virtually every event I attended, every field-visit strategy I received, every metric I had to hit, and every quiet conversation with other liaisons at conference hotel bars where someone finally admitted that none of this felt like it worked.

Yes, I’m that guy. But I have to do that because my brain demands it; that’s how many of us with Attention Deficit Disorder learn to manage our brains.

I attempted, year after year, to extrapolate actionable intelligence from my marketing notes – to find the patterns, to separate what actually generated referrals from what merely generated the appearance of effort, to map the landscape as it truly operates rather than how the industry brochures describe it.

Nearly ten years of observations.

Hundreds of events.

Thousands of account visits across four companies and two distinct healthcare service lines, all recorded in handwriting – handwriting that becomes progressively more agitated over the years.

For some reading, you know me; I’m not afraid to speak up.

Maybe none of this will have come as a surprise. The people I have worked alongside for years can confirm that I have been saying versions of everything in this article out loud in hallways, cars, and at lunch tables, and occasionally at volumes that made nearby colleagues uncomfortable.

The only thing that has changed is that I am finally writing it down somewhere other than a notebook that has coffee stains all over it.

The Healthcare Liaision Role Is Broken – Because Companies Don’t Understand

I’ve experienced firsthand the operating assumption in home health, home-based primary care, private duty home care, and hospice marketing that has calcified into gospel: put your marketing liaison in a car (usually the liaison’s car), pay them the bare minimum standard federal mileage, give them a territory, and expect six to eight (sometimes ten) account visits per day.

Additionally, liaisons measure the visits and follow-ups, track their time (visits), and report the visits (mostly in unnecessary meetings).

And organizations build their entire marketing performance evaluation of liaisons around the visits.

Let’s call the liaison visit the unit of measurement.

That’s it. I’m serious. Most of the time – that’s the entire measurement.

Why not the relationship between the liaison and whoever they built it with?

Why aren’t leaders in healthcare companies inquiring about the quality of their liaisons’ relationships rather than the sheer volume of recorded attempts to pester a case manager who doesn’t have the referral and won’t have one – until they give it?

The model failed me; I believe it’s broken. 

This is the model tens of thousands of healthcare marketing professionals are trained in right now, today, as you read this. And this is the model that is quietly, systematically failing across the industry while leadership teams stare at activity dashboards and wonder why census isn’t growing.

And some healthcare marketing teams have built their entire marketing infrastructure on a metric that has never been validated.

Why I Believe The Healthcare Liaison Model Is Broken

I am positing that the current healthcare marketing model is broken – but that doesn’t mean relationships with referral sources do not matter.

They matter enormously – of course.

I am saying that the specific methodology of unstructured, route-based, drop-in field visits measured by volume is a fundamentally flawed approach to building those relationships.

I have watched this method fail repeatedly.

What I am saying is that the healthcare industry hasn’t produced much credible, peer-reviewed evidence that this model converts visits into patient referrals at a rate that justifies the cost.

I spent years tracking the data: I used academic databases, industry reports, CRM vendor case studies, healthcare marketing conference presentations, and even private equity due diligence documents to find evidence. I searched for the golden metric regarding how many field visits one referral requires.

What is the visit-to-admission conversion rate?

Where’s the data?

The healthcare marketing industry has built a multibillion-dollar labor model on faith.

Here’s the bottom line: Most home care and healthcare agencies aren’t training their healthcare marketing professionals the right way – and it shows.

A Glimpse Into The Broken Healthcare Model in 2026

• You wake up early. Super early. In fairness, I’m an early riser.
• You likely check your CRM, assuming your company has bothered to implement one (many companies haven’t).
• You plan a route (or your line manager did the week before and told you where to go, because, of course, they inquire from you about the territory you’re hired to cover).
• You drive to your first referral account.
• You walk into a skilled nursing facility or hospital (for example) and ask to see the social worker or discharge planner.
• Half the time, you won’t see the social worker or discharge planner. A quarter of the time, the front desk person knows you don’t have an appointment. The front desk person calls the social worker, who says, “I’m in a meeting” (they typically aren’t), and you leave. Mission unaccomplished.
• In the remaining quarter, if you do make it past the front desk person (without a pre-established relationship), a social worker or case manager may give you two to four minutes while actively looking past you at their computer screen, because you are the third liaison to walk through their door this week, saying essentially the same thing. And then those rack cards with Gmail accounts will go right into the pile of other rack cards with company Gmail accounts. (Don’t ever use a Gmail account for a professional business. Ever.)

The marketing liaison asks a social worker or case manager who they likely disrupted by arriving unannounced at their workplace, and whether they have any patients who might benefit from your service. (I’m terribly guilty of this.)

Your marketing subject may nod politely and say, “Uh, huh, we’ll keep you in mind.”

And then the marketing professional leaves.

Onto the next one.

Then you drive to the next account.

And the next.

And the next.

• You log your visits (into a CRM, if you have one).

• You report your numbers into a dashboard system that your managers struggle to read because they never received training in advanced data analytics, through no fault of their own (they weren’t properly trained).

• Your manager, or someone who doesn’t understand data analytics but pretends to, reviews your activity and says you need to hit eight visits today, not six.
• The assumption is that more visits equal more referrals. More windshield time equals more patients.

Except nobody can prove that. They can’t prove it – maybe because they don’t know the difference.

Repeat the broken cycle until you quit or get burned out.

You’ll say: “I’m doing it that way because there is a better way.”

Why the Healthcare Liaison Model is Broken: 7 Structural Failures

The route-based model has at least seven structural failures that the industry refuses to confront honestly, based on what I have synthesized in my Moleskine notebook over nearly a decade.

1) Disruption

Drop-in visits are, by definition, interruptions.

A discharge planner managing thirty active cases does not want to be interrupted by someone who showed up unannounced with a brochure and a smile (sometimes people have bad breath, and we need to do the right thing and tell them their breath smells bad).

(I’m serious about the bad breath part. How many people at marketing and networking events do you know whom you have had thet utmost distinct displeasure of encountering the dead skunk-smell emanating precisely from their mouth cavity? Self-awareness time: I know I’m being rude; I don’t care. I don’t want to smell your bad breath, and please avoid close-talking.)

The marketing professional’s “marketing visit” is designed around the liaison’s schedule, not the referral source’s workflow. It communicates, whether you intend it or not, that your time is more important than theirs.

That is the opposite of relationship building. That is entitlement.

2) Commoditization

When every home health agency, every hospice, every private duty company, and every home-based primary care organization sends a liaison to the same accounts using the same methodology, you become indistinguishable.

You are one of four or five people walking through that door every week doing the same thing.

The discharge planner has a stack of brochures in their desk drawer that they never look at.

Your visit is noise, not signal.

3) The Activity Trap

When the metric is visits, the incentive is volume, not quality.

I have watched liaisons speed through accounts, barely making meaningful contact, checking boxes so the dashboard looks green.

I have done it myself on bad days. The system rewards motion, not connection.

And leadership teams, staring at spreadsheets full of visit counts, convince themselves that motion is progress.

4) Absence of attribution

Even when a referral comes in, most private duty and home health organizations cannot reliably trace it to a specific liaison visit, or they fail to train their intake team to mitigate the administrative data-entry load they expect marketing professionals to carry.

(Data entry is part of every gig. Accepted. Doctors and nurses chart every day. But when the titles don’t understand the data, why are marketing liaisons wasting their time?)

• Did the SNF social worker refer to you because you dropped by on a Tuesday at 3:30 pm.? Potentially.
• Or because the hospital social worker remembered your name from a case management fair you did six months ago at their hospital? Maybe.
• Or because a healthcare industry colleague mentioned your company in a hallway conversation? Possibly.
• Or because your intake team answered the phone in two rings when the competitor’s team didn’t pick up? Likely.

Nobody knows.

An unvalidated assumption of causation drives the entire model.

We need validation that things work when we market; otherwise, it’s unorganized chaos. Who wants that?

5) The Cost

A healthcare liaison costs roughly $80,000 to $100,000 per year in salary, benefits, mileage, vehicle expenses, and marketing materials (that is, if a company invests in you and pays marketing professionals what they’re actually worth.)

At seven visits per day over 250 working days, that is 1,750 annual visits.

If the conversion rate is even 5 percent (which would be generous based on available proxy data), you are generating roughly 88 referrals per year.

At that rate, the cost per acquired patient ranges from $900 to $1,100 before you factor in the referrals that don’t convert to admissions.

Nobody in leadership is doing this math. And the leadership went to the Ivy League schools? Come on.

It doesn’t take a Wharton degree and “The Firm” to correctly dashboard an organization’s unit economics and KPIs, then explain them to those of us with nothing more than a Western Maryland public school education.

The so-called marketing, growth enablement folks – the nice mid-level cogs within bland organizations – do not seemingly understand how to read unstructured data and make sense of it.

That’s a problem.

If they don’t know what the data means, then how do the mid-level company cogs explain it to the marketing professionals they hired to “go out there and get the business?”

Well, they don’t. And then they blame the marketing professionals for their leadership failures.

6) Liaison Burnout

The liaison turnover rate in healthcare marketing is staggering, and the industry treats this as a hiring problem rather than a model problem.

Driving 100 to 150 miles a day, making visits where you are frequently unwelcome, reporting metrics that feel meaningless, and watching your company measure your worth by the number of doors you walked through rather than the depth of the relationships you built is demoralizing.

And it’s entirely their fault for not caring about teaching marketing liaisons basic intelligence gathering and behavioral economics.

The best liaisons leave – and the ones who stay learn to game the system.

Neither outcome serves patients.

7) The Networking Event Industrial Complex

The networking event social gatherers deserve their own special conversation – and I am going to have it.

(This is where I’m going to lose people – and I know it. So be it.)

The same liaisons making route-based visits during the day are the same people showing up to every chamber of commerce breakfast, every senior services networking marketing event, every healthcare happy hour, and every charity golf tournament.

Attendance is expected not because these events generate referrals, as we all know they rarely do in any measurable way, but because leadership demands presence.

Because being “visible” is confused with being valuable.

I have attended hundreds of these healthcare networking events in the last decade; I can count on one hand the number that produced a direct, traceable patient referral.

But I can tell you exactly how many hours of productive relationship building they displaced.

The best liaisons leave organizations. The ones who stay learn to game the system. Neither outcome serves patients.

Why the Healthcare Liaison Model is Failing

The traditional healthcare liaison model is broken due to seven core structural failures:

1. Disruption: Unannounced drop-in visits interrupt clinical workflows.

2. Commoditization: Identical marketing tactics make providers indistinguishable.

3. The Activity Trap: Measuring volume (visits) over relationship quality.

4. Absence of Attribution: Inability to trace referrals to specific visits.

5. High Unit Costs: High salary/mileage costs vs. low conversion rates.

6. Liaison Burnout: Staggering turnover due to demoralizing metrics.

7. The Networking Complex: Over-reliance on low-value social events.

The Vice President of Growth and Enablement Title – Roll Your Eyes; It’s Okay

I need to talk about the people making the decisions who are directly responsible for their marketing professionals’ failures.

Somewhere in the last ten years, the healthcare industry decided that the way to fix its marketing problems was to invent executive titles.

• Vice President of Growth and Enablement.
• Director of Business Development
• Senior Director of Strategic Market Development.
• Chief Revenue Acceleration Officer.

I have reported to people with titles like these. I have liked many of them; however, some of them are insufferable.

I have sat in meetings led by people with titles like these.

And I can tell you, with the confidence that comes from watching the pattern repeat across multiple organizations, that the title is almost always inversely proportional to the person’s understanding of what actually happens in the field.

But I’m just a Western Maryland boy with a public school education.

These people are not behavioral psychologists or students of human motivation, nor have they spent years building trust with a discharge planner who has been burned by the last four companies that promised seamless transitions and reliable healthcare providers.

The titles, we’ll call them, are overwhelmingly people who came out of corporate sales environments or healthcare administration programs and were handed a marketing team without ever being required to understand why a social worker in a rural hospital makes referral decisions differently than an office manager at an urban physician practice.

The Biggest Problem: These Titles Don’t Understand People

The liaison field-visit model persists because the people who design and enforce it have never lived inside it. They may have never sat in a skilled nursing facility lobby for twenty minutes waiting to see someone who didn’t know they were coming. And they may have never driven forty-five minutes to an account only to be told the person they need is on PTO.

Have the titles ever watched a referral source’s face go flat when they realize you are the third liaison this week to walk through the door with the same pitch? The titles that mandate six to eight visits a day have, in most cases, never done so. They built the model from a spreadsheet (if even that), not from a parking lot.

Because these leaders have never lived within the model, they lack the fundamental psychological understanding of why it fails. They fail to understand that an unannounced visit to a busy healthcare professional is presumptuous rather than an effort to build a relationship.

But they’ll say, “You need to schedule and structure your visits.” With whom? The social workers who discharge patients every day and don’t have the time to lock in their schedules from one day to the next?

Okay, yeah, we’ll schedule our visits.

And these often well-intentioned folks – the titles – may fail to understand that referral decisions are driven by trust accumulated over months of demonstrated reliability, not by the frequency of lobby appearances. They may not understand that the liaison’s value is not in being seen but in being needed.

And they may never understand these things from behind a dashboard (if they even know how to use a CRM dashboard to its full capabilities) in a corporate office, a few hundred miles away from where you are.

Home care, healthcare, skilled nursing, hospice, wound care, home-based primary care – this industry does not have a shortage of marketing talent; it has a surplus of executives who may have never done the job they are managing.

The Performative Weekly Check-In Calls – Marketing Managers & The Marketers

Every Monday morning, or sometimes Tuesday, sometimes Friday, sometimes Wednesday – no, sorry, sometimes Tuesday – or maybe they’re scheduled for a Thursday – it’s a Teams call “check-in” with marketing liaisons.

Sometimes you’ll have the entire marketing team dial into these calls; sometimes it’s a one-on-one check-in.

The Vice President of Growth and Enablement may run the meeting, or maybe the executive director will (because in organizations that don’t function properly, nobody ever knows who’s really their boss or who’s in charge).

The agenda for these “check-in” meetings is always the same: “So, what did everyone (or you) do last week? What’s on your agenda for this week?”

I have sat through hundreds of these calls for nearly a decade. I have listened to liaison after liaison recite their visit logs, as students read book reports to a teacher who isn’t really listening.

• Fourteen visits.
• Three lunch-and-learns.
• Two networking events.
• One referral.

The person with the big, fancy title nods; then they type something into a spreadsheet (maybe). They’ll give you their unsolicited opinion, sometimes interrupting the presentation that you prepared for, about a territory they don’t understand.

Then, if needed, they’ll email you a follow-up recap of your check-in. Many times, that follow-up email you’ll receive appears exactly like it is: AI slop.

Sometimes, if you’re lucky, your marketing manager or executive director will munch away at their breakfast during your Teams call.

• Nobody on these calls really discusses an actual marketing strategy.
• Nobody discusses why a referral source that was sending three patients a month went silent.
• Nobody discusses the competitive intelligence collected during field visits.
• Nobody discusses the operational failures that are undermining the relationships the liaisons are building.
• Nobody discusses the behavioral patterns that distinguish a referral source genuinely considering a partnership from one being polite to get you out of their office.

My friends, the Teams call fooled you because it is not a strategy session.

You’ll love my honesty: The call is a subtle surveillance mechanism dressed in the language of collaboration.

Liaisons recognize the true nature of these calls. Every single one of them understands that leadership uses the calls to verify that bodies occupy cars and cars occupy parking lots. Leadership – the titles – know that these questions exist to confirm activity rather than to surface intelligence.

And so healthcare and home care marketing liaisons learn, very quickly, to perform the activity – to frame their week in terms of motion rather than meaning.

Wasted time.

To say “I visited twelve accounts” instead of “I spent ninety minutes with a discharge planner who is ready to send us her first referral next week, and here is why she trusts us and here is what she needs from our intake team to make it work.”

The first statement sounds productive.

The second statement is productive.

The weekly check-in call rewards the first and has no framework for recognizing the second.

The Titles Who Don’t Know The Marketing Territory

In the opening scene of Meredith Willson’s The Music Man, a group of traveling salesmen rides the Rock Island line, arguing in rhythm with the train about what it takes to sell.

Their conclusion, repeated like a warning, is simple: you gotta know the territory.

Professor Harold Hill, a con man, rolls into early 1900s River City, Iowa – a city he has never visited – to execute a scene where he sells a memorized marching-band pitch and a product he cannot deliver. He woos the town librarian through song and dance, reconciles the school board, warns the citizens about the imminent dangers of a pool table, and helps a young Ron Howard shed his lisp and gain confidence.

Honestly, Professor Harold Hill, class of aught five, Gary Conservatory, is a hero. But he still didn’t know the territory. Maybe the Wells Fargo Wagon will bring the much-needed change in the healthcare marketing industry in 2026.

The healthcare industry is full of Harold Hills. They arrive from corporate offices with pitch decks and playbooks, and they have never once set foot in the communities they expect their liaisons to convert.

The arrival of corporate representatives and their “site visits” frustrates me, and I want to be transparent about my qualms. You want to come along and see where the company is failing? Sure, come along.

But don’t expect me to stay quiet about all the challenges that exist in our world when the titles schedule a tagalong that marketing professionals didn’t ask for.

I was born and raised in Western Maryland. I grew up in Hagerstown. I understand how business is done in Washington County, the way you understand the layout of your childhood home.

Most of us know which organizations have credibility and which ones are coasting on a name, and we know which decision-makers respond to data and which respond to relationships built over decades, not quarters.

A handshake in Hagerstown carries a weight that other Maryland communities do not share, just as an unnecessary presentation or some ridiculous activity will lead a community that values plainspoken honesty to politely or quietly dismiss you.

I’ve worked across Maryland: Montgomery, Frederick, Howard, Anne Arundel, and Prince George’s Counties. I’ve worked in Northern Virginia and in the District. The Metro D.C. area is not one market but rather a dozen overlapping markets with distinct cultures, referral patterns, professional norms, and definitions of what constitutes trustworthy behavior.

The marketing professionals who’ve been doing this long enough can gather enough data to assemble a near-perfect multipage profile on every human being – keyword: human – every referral source.

Because some marketing professionals go the extra twenty miles to understand the people to whom they market -their nature, how they fundamentally operate in the world, what’s most important to them, and how they process information.

Human relationship maintenance.

A marketing approach that works in a Rockville physician’s office could easily fail miserably inside a Maugansville-based skilled nursing facility. Not because one market is more sophisticated than the other. It’s because we’re looking at two fundamentally different communities with fundamentally different expectations.

And yet, the marketing strategy arrives from a corporate remote office (likely their home office or living room) – people whom we’ve seen only once in person and oftentimes become a permanent virtual fixture. It’s someone who has never met the targeted referral sources and who writes these scripts and templates using rushed ChatGPT prompts that fail to understand the audience.

Algorithms can generate target account lists that know zip codes but don’t understand communities.

When the liaison – the person who actually lives in the territory, knows the players, and understands why a specific approach will not work with a particular population – raises a hand to say, “That is not how business is done here,” management sometimes tells them to follow the playbook.

What playbook?

They don’t have a playbook; they sometimes make it up as they go.

“fOlLoW tHe PlAyBoOk.”

“lOG ur StOps”

“HiT yOuR nUmBeRs.”

“i’M hErE tO hElP. Thx.”

All of the above – that’s me mocking actual responses I’ve received in my career when I’ve asked legitimate marketing questions that require more than a chatbot to answer. Organizations prioritize scalable systems over local intelligence, designing playbooks to ensure replicability and achieve efficiency.

But healthcare is not efficient.

Healthcare is local.

Healthcare is personal

Healthcare is a discharge planner who has worked at the same hospital for nineteen years and has seen thirty liaison companies come and go, who can tell within two minutes whether the person sitting across from them understands their community or is reciting a script written by someone who has never set foot in her county.

The home health and healthcare liaison-based companies that succeed in local markets are those that hire people who know those markets and then trust them to operate autonomously.

Companies succeed when they interview marketing professionals and ask them, on the spot, how to build a relationship with front-desk gatekeepers and how to earn their trust, just enough to get into the social work’s hallway – but then once you’re there, you’re on your own.

Do companies ever teach behavioral psychology to marketing professionals, teaching them how to build relationships with people who can become cheerleaders for the output that your service provides?

Believe me, it’s not about how many damn Starbucks and little gift baskets you bring. The trailblazers who sit at the front desk are marketing liaisons’ most powerful allies. If only companies taught them why, imagine how much time liaisons could save by skipping the nonsense, being a human, and talking to somebody like a person.

Healthcare and private-duty companies fail when they hire local talent and then override every instinct that talent possesses with a corporate playbook built for a market three hundred miles away. If you do not understand the people you are trying to serve, you will not serve them.

And no number of field visits will compensate for that failure.

The COVID Experiment Nobody Analyzed

In March 2020, marketing field visits stopped.

Overnight.

Except when Anu calls you from Sunrise of Bethesda – you answer the phone, you do what she tells you, and you show up with masks, and you’ve made a friend for life. That’s a real anecdote. That’s a real friendship.

Virtually every healthcare liaison in America drifted off the road at the beginning of COVID. I say virtually because my wife and I inherited a house in Florida, visited southwest Florida throughout the fall of 2020 – and yeah, we saw it all, in Florida. And none of it was good.

Things shut down.

We stayed home, for the most part.

No more liaison drop-ins to the social workers at the SNFs.

No more route-based marketing. No more windshield time – until the summer of 2020, at least.

If the field-visit model were the engine of patient-volume growth that the industry claims, referral volumes should have collapsed. They should have fallen off a cliff.

But they didn’t.

Some organizations saw temporary dips. Most stabilized within weeks. Many saw referral patterns hold steady or even increase as intake teams improved phone response times and digital communication channels filled the gap. The natural experiment was right there, staring the industry in the face.

And almost nobody studied it.

Believe me, I’ve tried to find the information every which way I could. I haven’t seen much data published because perhaps the findings would have undermined the justification for an entire labor category. I am not arguing that relationships stopped mattering during COVID. I am arguing that the relationships that survived were those built on genuine trust and clinical credibility, not those maintained through obligatory biweekly drop-ins.

The liaisons who had actually become trusted advisors to their referral sources continued to receive calls. The ones who had been showing up with donuts and brochures became invisible the moment they couldn’t show up anymore.

That tells you everything you need to know about what was actually driving referrals. These relationships will live on my cell phone for a lifetime until they entomb me at Rest Haven in Hagerstown alongside my grandparents and great-grandparents.

You see what I mean about small-town relationships?

How come mid-level cogs who interview marketing professionals never ask about these kinds of relationships? If they don’t, they shouldn’t be working for you.

What Actually Works In Liaison-Based Healthcare and Home Care Marketing

I spent years participating in the broken healthcare and home care marketing model – before I understood what the alternative looked like.

The model remains broken. And I want to be honest about that.

I am not writing this from some theoretical perch. I made cold drop-ins at every company I worked for. I logged windshield time at every company I worked for.

I attended (and continue to attend) the networking events. I l know the early work, the crummy breakfast sandwiches, the awkward conversations with the same people.

But the referrals that actually materialized, the ones that turned into patients, the ones that built sustained volume, came from something entirely different.

Those referrals came from becoming indispensable.

• The social worker who called me at 4:45 p.m. on a Friday in the summer, when you’re just ready to head down to the Shore, because she had a complex discharge and trusted me to handle it. Then you don’t go to the Shore until whatever needs get done – gets done.
• The senior living community sales director who referred three residents in a month because I had taken the time to understand their panel demographics and could articulate exactly which patients would benefit from our service model. I wanted to meet with their families, explain the transition, how we can help, what we can do, and offer myself as a consummate resource. Because it matters to families. Because I want the same level of service for my grandmother.
• The activities director at a senior living community, who invited me to present to her residents because I had first offered to host a free educational session with no strings attached.
• The most wonderful human beings on the planet – the Adult Protective Service social workers in Washington County – who showed up at the homes of people who needed help and trusted me enough to accompany them while they performed miracles. I learned more at an older adult’s home alongside an APS social worker than I would have learned in ten marketing meetings that typically never materialized into anything.

Dropping in eight times in four weeks built none of those relationships. They were built by leading with value, demonstrating clinical literacy, solving problems, and being the person who answered the phone on the first ring when it mattered.

The distinction is fundamental. A liaison who operates as a brochure delivery service is a cost center. A liaison who operates as a behavioral intelligence professional, someone who reads stakeholders, collects strategic information, architects relationship ecosystems, and positions value based on a genuine understanding of partner challenges, is a revenue driver. The industry trains for the former and wonders why it can’t find the latter.

A liaison who operates as a brochure delivery service is a cost center. A liaison who operates as a behavioral intelligence professional is a revenue driver.

The Five Things Healthcare Marketing Leadership Needs to Hear

1) Stop Measuring Marketing Visits and Start Measuring Relationships

I understand that relationships are harder to quantify than visits, but that’s no excuse to measure the wrong thing.

Here’s what organizations should track: 

• Track referral source engagement quality.
• Track response time to incoming referrals.
• Track referral-to-admission conversion rates by source.
• Track referral source retention.

These are harder metrics to build dashboards around, but they are the only metrics that matter.

2) Stop Sending Marketing Liaisons into the Field Without Training Them in Behavioral Intelligence

Most healthcare liaison training consists of a product overview, a CRM tutorial, and a territory map.

Congratulations, the company prepared the marketing liaison for failure.

A liaison operating in complex healthcare environments needs rapid personality assessment skills, motivational architecture mapping, emotional intelligence training, and systematic intelligence collection capabilities.

I would spend the rest of my career and life educating organizations about this salient, axiomatic principle – a hill I would die on.

The home care private-duty marketing liaision (insert any industry) is NOT sales. It is strategic relationship architecture.

3) Stop Confusing Presence With Value

Showing up is NOT a strategy.

Showing up with something useful is a strategy.

Every single interaction a liaison has with a referral source should either solve a problem, deliver intelligence, provide education, or deepen trust.

If the visit doesn’t accomplish at least one of those objectives, it is not a visit – it’s an interruption.

And your referral sources are tired of being interrupted and disrupted by someone and something that offers absolutely no value and only wants something from them.

That’s not a healthy two-way relationship.

4) Stop Forcing Marketing Liaisons to do Three Jobs at Once

This is the part of the conversation that leadership does not want to have.

• Your community liaison is not a social worker.
• Your community liaison is not a care coordinator.
• Your community liaison is not your intake department, your scheduling department, or your quality assurance team. But in practice, at company after company, that is exactly what they become.
• The liaison builds a relationship with a discharge planner over several months.
• They earn trust.

Then a referral comes in.

What happens next is the infuriating part: the organization’s operational machinery fails.

• Intake is oftentimes….slow.
• Scheduling may drop the ball.
• A clinician is a no-show (often due to a scheduling error).
• The patient falls through the cracks.

And who gets the phone call from the furious referral source?

Not the intake coordinator.

Not the scheduler.

Not the regional director – or whatever title they need to show you on their business card.

The liaison takes that call – because the liaison is the face of their assigned marketing territory.

The liaison is the relationship, and that liaison now stands before a trusted professional contact to apologize for an operational failure that the liaison did not create, could not prevent, and has no authority to fix.

The healthcare and home care industry sometimes damages its best marketing professionals by sending them out to build relationships, only to hand them a broken product to represent.

And when the referral source stops calling, leadership blames the liaison’s “territory performance.”

How Dare Them. 

Not the fifteen-minute hold time on the intake line?

Not the missed visit that nobody communicated?

Not the incompetent mid-level cogs?

Not the scheduling team dropping the ball for the umpteenth time?

Not the recruitment problem?

If your company’s operations cannot deliver what your marketing promises, you do not have a marketing problem. You have an operations problem.

Stop making your liaisons manage it. Stop punishing your marketing liaisons operating within a system that demands they work harder to make up for what they cannot control.

If your operations cannot deliver what your marketing promises, you do not have a marketing problem. You have an operations problem.

5) Stop Turning Marketing Liaisons into Social Workers & Activity Directors and Planners

I need to say this plainly because the industry has completely lost the plot on role definition.

A community liaison is a strategic marketing professional. That is the job.

• When you need someone to coordinate complex care transitions, hire a social worker.
• When you need someone to manage aging clients through multisystem healthcare navigation, hire an aging life care manager.
• When you need someone to advocate for vulnerable older adults across service systems, hire a geriatric advocate.

These are distinct professional disciplines with distinct training, distinct skill sets, and distinct ethical frameworks. They are not interchangeable with marketing.

But the healthcare marketing and home care industries treat them as interchangeable because it is cheaper to combine three roles into one salary.

Please stop doing this, business owners. 

And then there is the activity director problem.

I have lost count of the number of times I have been asked, as a marketing professional representing a legitimate clinical service, to call Bingo, host a craft session, or run a trivia game. Often, I fill a slot on an assisted living community’s activity calendar because the community’s own programming staff failed to plan far enough ahead.

This is not marketing.

This is not relationship building.

This is not strategic.

It is a performative hoop within the care industry that requires liaisons to jump through as the unspoken price of admission, as though a home-based primary care company offering a clinically validated service to their residents needs to audition by entertaining the lunch crowd first.

Business owners: If you want your marketing liaisons to learn how to become an activity directory, teach them and pay them more money.

There are better ways to engage with senior living communities:

• Educational seminars that position the liaison’s clinical literacy.
• Health and wellness presentations that demonstrate genuine expertise.
• Q&A sessions where residents and families can ask real questions and get real answers from someone who understands the healthcare landscape.
• Technology security and safety discussions.
• Scam prevention workshops.

These approaches showcase what a skilled marketing professional actually brings to a partnership. They build credibility. They generate enrollment. And they do not require your liaison to pretend she is Julie from the cruise ship.

The industry needs a professional system for community engagement. An approach grounded in mutual respect between the service provider and the facility. Not a series of degrading entry-level hoops designed by administrators who cannot distinguish between entertainment and education.

Why I Am Writing This

I am writing this because I spent nearly a decade inside a system that I knew was broken – and I participated in it anyway.

I am writing this because there are thousands of talented, empathetic, intelligent healthcare marketing professionals right now sitting in their cars between account visits, wondering why the work feels hollow.

Wondering why they are apologizing to referral sources for failures they didn’t cause.

I wonder why they are calling Bingo when they have an MBA, and I wonder why a company measures its marketing liaison’s odometer instead of the output gathered from their intelligence trek for the week?

I am writing this because leadership teams at home health agencies, hospice companies, and home care or private duty organizations deserve better than the consulting platitudes they have been sold.

Many of these organizations have bought into a version of relationship-based marketing that forces staff to drive more miles and fill activity calendars.

I am writing this because I built a 450-page training manual for healthcare community liaisons that redefines the role from the ground up, and I realized while building it that the manual would be useless within systems that measure windshield time rather than wisdom.

And I am writing this because I believe this industry can do better; it absolutely has to.

This is a rallying cry.

• There are far too many talented people whose talents only need to be harnessed and directed. I was one of those kids.
• The patients who need home-based care deserve liaisons who are trusted advisors in their communities, not traveling salespeople with branded polo shirts and a quota.
• The referral sources who coordinate care for vulnerable populations deserve partners who show up with solutions, not interruptions. The liaisons themselves deserve a career model that rewards intelligence, empathy, and strategic thinking rather than mileage logs.

I participated in the bad behavior for nearly a decade. At four companies. Across two healthcare verticals. I am now in the business of naming it.

The route-based model fails not because liaisons lack skill, but because its design ignores how healthcare relationships actually form.

Leadership, I have learned, is built on this system to mirror how car dealerships sell sedans, forgetting that the person on the other side of the interaction is a social worker managing thirty families in crisis rather than a customer in a showroom.

Somewhere along the way, the industry forgot that the healthcare community liaison serves as a strategic professional, not a Bingo caller with the federally mandated minimum mileage reimbursement.

Maybe the industry forgot that a referral represents a human being and a family, not a transaction.

A discharge planner trusts you with a patient’s life because you earned that trust through competence, not through the frequency of your lobby visits.

We can fix this.

But first, we have to stop pretending the odometer is a KPI.

Stick with me. In a follow-up piece, I’m going to explain everything we need to do to revolutionize the home care and home health marketing industry in 2026.

---

Hi, I’m Ryan! I help healthcare organizations avoid the problems I’ve written about. I’m a writer and the founder of Sentinel Silver, a technology support company for older adults. I spent nearly a decade working for home care and healthcare organizations as a marketing professional across the Metro D.C. area. I write about branding, marketing psychology, behavioral psychology, consumer psychology, and what actually works for me.